Rs 15,000 Crore Crisis: Maneka Gandhi Issues ‘Rat Invasion’ Warning, Delhi’s Stray Dog Order incites OUTRAGE!
Maneka Gandhi has stated in public that the court’s order on removal of stray dogs is “impractical,” “financially unviable,” and “potentially harmful” to the region’s ecological balance.
A heated public discussion has been sparked by the Supreme Court of India’s recent order to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR’s streets and place them in shelters. This law aims to put public safety first and is motivated by worries about an increase in dog bites and rabies cases. Prominent animal rights advocates, most notably Maneka Gandhi, have opposed it strongly, using a historical comparison of 19th-century Paris to warn of possible unexpected ecological repercussions, including an increase in rat populations.
The complex conflict between the welfare of the general public and the humane treatment of animals is highlighted in this report, which also explores the specifics of the court’s order, analyzes the historical parallel presented, considers the enormous practical and financial challenges of implementation, and looks at the wider implications for animal welfare policy and urban management in India.
Introduction: A Public outcry, a Court Order, and a Historical Lesson
The Supreme Court of India gave a comprehensive ruling on August 12, 2025, which has had a significant influence on the National Capital Region’s (NCR) urban animal control discussion. All stray dogs in Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, and Ghaziabad must be removed from public areas immediately, according to this directive, which further specifies that they must be sent to shelters and that it is strictly forbidden that they be put back on the streets.
A suo motu lawsuit that was started on July 28 in response to a reported rise in rabies cases and stray dog bites in the capital—a scenario the court called “extremely grim”—led to the judicial intervention. This legal action emphasizes how urgent it is to solve issues of public health and safety in crowded urban settings.
Maneka Gandhi’s Pivotal Role and Her “When Paris Killed Dogs” Analogy
Maneka Gandhi, a well-known animal rights campaigner and former Union Minister, has been a prominent voice of opposition following the Supreme Court’s ruling. Her use of a historical analogy in her criticism of the order—summed up in the phrase “When Paris Killed Dogs”—makes it stand out. Maneka Gandhi has stated in public that the court’s order is “impractical,” “financially unviable,” and “potentially harmful” to the region’s ecological balance, implying that the decision was made “out of anger” rather than with reason. Her historical allusion is meant to act as a warning, highlighting the unintended detrimental effects of extreme animal population control techniques.
The Supreme Court’s Order: Immediate Removal, Relocation to Shelters, Prohibition of Release
Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan gave the Supreme Court’s direction, which is clear: it demands the “immediate removal of all stray dogs from public spaces” in Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, and Ghaziabad. The clear directive that “no captured animal will be released back on the streets” is a pillar of this edict. The Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, which previously required the return of sterilized canines to their native territories—a practice the court has now deemed “absurd”—are directly challenged by this clause.
Within eight weeks, civic officials are expected to set up dog shelters with a designated capacity of 5,000 to 6,000 canines. To prevent animal abuse or unauthorized release, these facilities should incorporate CCTV surveillance in addition to staff for general care, vaccinations, and sterilization.
Responses from Delhi Mayor and Other Municipal Bodies (Gurgaon, Ghaziabad, Noida)
Different levels of readiness and awareness of the Supreme Court’s mandate are reflected in the diverse instant responses by local authorities around the NCR. Iqbal Singh, the mayor of Delhi, expressed excitement in the Supreme Court’s ruling and promised that the government will do everything in its power to put the order into effect within the next six weeks. Despite the existing lack of government-run facilities, he proposed setting up either temporary or permanent shelters.
Municipalities in other NCR cities, however, seem to have been “caught off guard” by this. They would first “study the Supreme Court order and then decide on the further course of action,” said Gurgaon Municipal Commissioner Pradeep Dahiya, recognizing the difficult issue of securing space for shelters. This suggests a widespread lack of readiness and the urgent need for thorough preparation throughout the area.
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news updates.
1 thought on “Rs 15,000 Crore Crisis: Maneka Gandhi Issues ‘Rat Invasion’ Warning, Delhi’s Stray Dog Order incites OUTRAGE!”